Search for: All records

Abstract ObjectivesTo quantify differences between (1) stratifying patients by predicted disease onset risk alone and (2) stratifying by predicted disease onset risk and severity of downstream outcomes. We perform a case study of predicting sepsis. Materials and MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis using observational data from Michigan Medicine at the University of Michigan (U-M) between 2016 and 2020 and the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) between 2008 and 2012. We measured the correlation between the estimated sepsis risk and the estimated effect of sepsis on mortality using Spearman’s correlation. We compared patients stratified by sepsis risk with patients stratified by sepsis risk and effect of sepsis on mortality. ResultsThe U-M and BIDMC cohorts included 7282 and 5942 ICU visits; 7.9% and 8.1% developed sepsis, respectively. Among visits with sepsis, 21.9% and 26.3% experienced mortality at U-M and BIDMC. The effect of sepsis on mortality was weakly correlated with sepsis risk (U-M: 0.35 [95% CI: 0.33-0.37], BIDMC: 0.31 [95% CI: 0.28-0.34]). High-risk patients identified by both stratification approaches overlapped by 66.8% and 52.8% at U-M and BIDMC, respectively. Accounting for risk of mortality identified an older population (U-M: age = 66.0 [interquartile range—IQR: 55.0-74.0] vs age = 63.0 [IQR: 51.0-72.0], BIDMC: age = 74.0 [IQR: 61.0-83.0] vs age = 68.0 [IQR: 59.0-78.0]). DiscussionPredictive models that guide selective interventions ignore the effect of disease on downstream outcomes. Reformulating patient stratification to account for the estimated effect of disease on downstream outcomes identifies a different population compared to stratification on disease risk alone. ConclusionModels that predict the risk of disease and ignore the effects of disease on downstream outcomes could be suboptimal for stratification. 

Introduction:Estimating the effects of comorbidities on risk of all-cause dementia (ACD) could potentially better inform prevention strategies and identify novel risk factors compared to more common post-hoc analyses from predictive modeling. Methods:In a retrospective cohort study of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from US Veterans Affairs Medical Centers between 2009 and 2021, we used machine learning techniques from the treatment effect estimation literature to estimate individualized effects of 25 comorbidities (e.g., hypertension) on ACD risk within 10 years of MCI diagnosis. Age and healthcare utilization were adjusted for using exact matching. Results:After matching, of 19,797 MCI patients, 6,767 (34.18%) experienced ACD onset. Dyslipidemia (percentage point increase of ACD risk range across different treatment effect estimation techniques = 0.009–0.044), hypertension (range = 0.007–0.043), and diabetes (range = 0.007–0.191) consistently had non-zero average effects. Discussion:Our findings support known associations between dyslipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes that increase the risk of ACD in MCI patients, demonstrating the potential for these approaches to identify novel risk factors. 

BACKGROUND Timely interventions, such as antibiotics and intravenous fluids, have been associated with reduced mortality in patients with sepsis. Artificial intelligence (AI) models that accurately predict risk of sepsis onset could speed the delivery of these interventions. Although sepsis models generally aim to predict its onset, clinicians might recognize and treat sepsis before the sepsis definition is met. Predictions occurring after sepsis is clinically recognized (i.e., after treatment begins) may be of limited utility. Researchers have not previously investigated the accuracy of sepsis risk predictions that are made before treatment begins. Thus, we evaluate the discriminative performance of AI sepsis predictions made throughout a hospitalization relative to the time of treatment. METHODS We used a large retrospective inpatient cohort from the University of Michigan’s academic medical center (2018–2020) to evaluate the Epic sepsis model (ESM). The ability of the model to predict sepsis, both before sepsis criteria are met and before indications of treatment plans for sepsis, was evaluated in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Indicators of a treatment plan were identified through electronic data capture and included the receipt of antibiotics, fluids, blood culture, and/or lactate measurement. The definition of sepsis was a composite of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s surveillance criteria and the severe sepsis and septic shock management bundle definition. RESULTS The study included 77,582 hospitalizations. Sepsis occurred in 3766 hospitalizations (4.9%). ESM achieved an AUROC of 0.62 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 0.63) when including predictions before sepsis criteria were met and in some cases, after clinical recognition. When excluding predictions after clinical recognition, the AUROC dropped to 0.47 (95% CI, 0.46 to 0.48). CONCLUSIONS We evaluate a sepsis risk prediction model to measure its ability to predict sepsis before clinical recognition. Our work has important implications for future work in model development and evaluation, with the goal of maximizing the clinical utility of these models. (Funded by Cisco Research and others.) 

Noisy training labels can hurt model performance. Most approaches that aim to address label noise assume label noise is independent from the input features. In practice, however, label noise is often feature or \textit{instance-dependent}, and therefore biased (i.e., some instances are more likely to be mislabeled than others). E.g., in clinical care, female patients are more likely to be under-diagnosed for cardiovascular disease compared to male patients. Approaches that ignore this dependence can produce models with poor discriminative performance, and in many healthcare settings, can exacerbate issues around health disparities. In light of these limitations, we propose a two-stage approach to learn in the presence instance-dependent label noise. Our approach utilizes \textit{\anchor points}, a small subset of data for which we know the observed and ground truth labels. On several tasks, our approach leads to consistent improvements over the state-of-the-art in discriminative performance (AUROC) while mitigating bias (area under the equalized odds curve, AUEOC). For example, when predicting acute respiratory failure onset on the MIMIC-III dataset, our approach achieves a harmonic mean (AUROC and AUEOC) of 0.84 (SD [standard deviation] 0.01) while that of the next best baseline is 0.81 (SD 0.01). Overall, our approach improves accuracy while mitigating potential bias compared to existing approaches in the presence of instance-dependent label noise. 

Abstract INTRODUCTIONIdentifying mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients at risk for dementia could facilitate early interventions. Using electronic health records (EHRs), we developed a model to predict MCI to all‐cause dementia (ACD) conversion at 5 years. METHODSCox proportional hazards model was used to identify predictors of ACD conversion from EHR data in veterans with MCI. Model performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] and Brier score) was evaluated on a held‐out data subset. RESULTSOf 59,782 MCI patients, 15,420 (25.8%) converted to ACD. The model had good discriminative performance (AUC 0.73 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72–0.74]), and calibration (Brier score 0.18 [95% CI 0.17–0.18]). Age, stroke, cerebrovascular disease, myocardial infarction, hypertension, and diabetes were risk factors, while body mass index, alcohol abuse, and sleep apnea were protective factors. DISCUSSIONEHR‐based prediction model had good performance in identifying 5‐year MCI to ACD conversion and has potential to assist triaging of at‐risk patients. HighlightsOf 59,782 veterans with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 15,420 (25.8%) converted to all‐cause dementia within 5 years.Electronic health record prediction models demonstrated good performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.73; Brier 0.18).Age and vascular‐related morbidities were predictors of dementia conversion.Synthetic data was comparable to real data in modeling MCI to dementia conversion. Key PointsAn electronic health record–based model using demographic and co‐morbidity data had good performance in identifying veterans who convert from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to all‐cause dementia (ACD) within 5 years.Increased age, stroke, cerebrovascular disease, myocardial infarction, hypertension, and diabetes were risk factors for 5‐year conversion from MCI to ACD.High body mass index, alcohol abuse, and sleep apnea were protective factors for 5‐year conversion from MCI to ACD.Models using synthetic data, analogs of real patient data that retain the distribution, density, and covariance between variables of real patient data but are not attributable to any specific patient, performed just as well as models using real patient data. This could have significant implications in facilitating widely distributed computing of health‐care data with minimized patient privacy concern that could accelerate scientific discoveries. 

Abstract IntroductionStudies investigating the relationship between blood pressure (BP) measurements from electronic health records (EHRs) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) rely on summary statistics, like BP variability, and have only been validated at a single institution. We hypothesize that leveraging BP trajectories can accurately estimate AD risk across different populations. MethodsIn a retrospective cohort study, EHR data from Veterans Affairs (VA) patients were used to train and internally validate a machine learning model to predict AD onset within 5 years. External validation was conducted on patients from Michigan Medicine (MM). ResultsThe VA and MM cohorts included 6860 and 1201 patients, respectively. Model performance using BP trajectories was modest but comparable (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] = 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.54–0.73] for VA vs. AUROC = 0.66 [95% CI = 0.55–0.76] for MM). ConclusionApproaches that directly leverage BP trajectories from EHR data could aid in AD risk stratification across institutions.